COMMENTARY ON «TAWILAT AHL AL-SUNNA» AND ITS SOURCES

  This article attempts to analyze each of the sources of "Tauilat" from the point of view of source study and Islamic studies, and also provides evidence that the comments of Imam Maturidi are based not only on narration / stories /, but also on the methods of dirayat and polemics.
   The article describes the scholar's perfect awareness of commentaries written before him, his skills to combine critical methodology based on relation to the chain of hadiths and stories, based on the system of Dirayat method. The paper also demonstrated his skills to make references to the narratives / stories / described in the Quran stories. The article is a reasoned answer for a certain circle of people who believe that this work does not belong to Imam Maturidi.

1. Badrud-din Zarkashi. Burxan fi Ulum al-Kuran. – Damask: ―Ixiya kutub arabiya‖ 1957. – T. I – 1652 b.

2. Мҧхаммед ибн Ахмед Ҽбу Бҽкір Алҽуддин Ҽс-Самарқанди, Шарху Тҽуилҽтул Матуриди, Сулеймания кітапханасы (жазба). Хамидия, № 176, 2а.

3. Ҽбу Мaнсур ҽл-Мaтуриди. Тaуилaт aһли суннa. Бейрут: ―Кутуб илмия‖ 2005. – Т. I – 638 б.

4. Даууди Шамсуддин Мухамед ибн Ҽли, Табақату ҽл-Муфассирин, 2 том, Бейрут, дар ҽл-кутуб илмия, 1983.

5. Абдулкҽрим Зҽйдҽн «Ҽл-Мҽдхал лидирасҽтиш Шариғатил Исламия», Бағдат, 1969, 130-135 б.

6. Ҽбу Абдулла Шҽмсуддин Мҧхаммед Ҽз-Зҽһҽби, Тҽзкиратул хуффҽз, Бҽйрут, 1 том, 178-183 б.

7. Ибн Халликан Шамсуддин Ахмед ибн Ҽбу Бҽкір, Уҽфҽятҥл аян уҽ ҽнбҽ у ҽнбҽ и заман, I-VIII, Бейрут 1978, 329-330 б.

8. Мҧхaммед Ибрaһим Шaриф. Бухус фи тaфсир Қҧрaн Кaрим. // [Электронды aдрес: www.Kt-b.com]