WAYS TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT

Increasing the productivity of production systems and equipment in the meat industry is inextricably linked with maintenance activities. The article analyzes the influence of manufacturability, hygiene, reliability, simplicity of equipment design on the main indicators of the quality of meat products. It is shown that the Total Productive Maintenance (TRM) and Lean production strategy is an important tool for evaluating the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) indicator, which is used to evaluate the main types of losses that reduce the efficiency of equipment. The relationship of structural and mechanical characteristics of food masses, humidity of raw materials, temperature and viscosity, processing pressure, density on the optimal operating modes of the equipment is analyzed. Using the OEE concept, the time losses associated with the functioning of the equipment are determined. The types of losses are classified: downtime and changeover (availability or readiness) of equipment, short-term shutdown of equipment and reduction of processing speed (equipment performance), defective products and product losses at startup (quality) of equipment. The application of this method of studying the overall efficiency of the equipment can be applied to any technological equipment used in the meat industry and will eliminate many problems that arise during the operation of technological equipment, improve its technical and economic indicators, develop a system of measures to improve its maintenance and repair. Using this concept, it is possible to systematize the factors that reduce the efficiency of the equipment. At the same time, it is proved that information about the factors affecting the loss of equipment operation time allows you to create a system for maintenance and repair of equipment. 

1. Vumek Dzh. Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo: Kak izbavit'sya ot poter' i dobit'sya protsvetaniya vashei kompanii: per. s angl. / Dzh. Vumek, D. Dzhons. – M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2013. – 472 s. (In Russian).

2. Ihueze C.C. Maximizing overall equipment effectiveness in a food processing industry: a case study / C.C. Ihueze, C.M. U-Dominic // Archives of Current Research International. – 2017. – № 11(4). – R. 1-10. (In English).

3. Afefy I. Implementation of total productive maintenance and overall equipment effectiveness evaluation / I. Afefy // International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering. – 2014. – № 13(1). – R. 60-75. (In English).

4. Sharma A. Manufacturing performance and evolution of TPM / Sharma A. Shudhanshu, Bhardway A. // International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. – 2012. – № 4(3). – R. 854-866. (In English).

5. Methodology of overall equipment effectiveness calculation in the context of Industry 4.0 environment / Z. Aleš et al // Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and reliability. – 2019. – № 21(3). – R. 411-418. (In English).

6. Powell T. Tanya Sammut‐Bonnici Pareto analysis / T. Powell // In book: Wiley Encyclopedia of Management Publisher: John Wiley & Sons. Project: Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. – 2015. – Vol 12. (In English).

7. Netes V.A. Pareto analysis approach to reliability improvement / V.A. Netes // 2d International Workshop on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN 2000). – 2000. – P. 187-191.

8. Peleev A.I. Tekhnologicheskoe oborudovanie predpriyatii myasnoi promyshlennosti / A.I. Peleev. – M.: Pishchevaya promyshlennost', 1971. – 519 s. (In English).

9. Smirnov M.B. Oborudovanie dlya formovaniya pishchevykh mass: Analiticheskii obzor / M.B. Smirnov, G.B. Abdilova, D.T. Manapova. – Semei: «Pro100print», 2019. – 81 s. (In Russian).

10. Prognozirovanie kachestva myasnoi produktsii metodami matematicheskogo programmirovaniya / A.B. Lisitsyn et al // Teoriya i praktika pererabotki myasa. – 2016. – № 1(1). – S. 75-90. (In Russian).

11. Obshchaya ehffektivnost' oborudovaniya / per. s angl. – M.: Institut kompleksnykh strategicheskikh issledovanii, 2007. – 120 s. (In Russian).