Preview

Bulletin of Shakarim University. Technical Sciences

Advanced search

COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF FOOD EGGS

https://doi.org/10.53360/2788-7995-2024-3(15)-13

Abstract

The most commonly consumed poultry eggs in the world are chicken and duck eggs. Eggs contain all the essential amino acids, making them an excellent source of complete protein. Egg whites, both chicken and duck, are similar in composition and have many functional properties.

The purpose of this work is to comparatively characterize the chemical composition and quality characteristics of commercially available eggs of various types produced in Kazakhstan. The work used generally accepted chemical and physical methods of determination, as a result of which it was established that all types of eggs differ in quality characteristics and chemical composition. The experiments carried out established that duck eggs have the largest mass (79.49 g). Egg white has an alkaline pH, while the yolk has a neutral pH. The highest water content is found in chicken protein (87.7%), duck eggs have a high lipid content - 36.79%, and the highest ash content in quail eggs – 1.8 g.

The results of the research will be used in the development of egg products from raw materials that must meet the requirements of the standard.

About the Authors

S. Kamanova
Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University named after S. Seifullin
Kazakhstan

Svetlana Kamanova – master of technical sciences,

010000, Astana Zhenis ave., 62



L. Murat
Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University named after S. Seifullin
Kazakhstan

linara Murat – master of technical sciences,

010000, Astana Zhenis ave., 62



A. Yessenzhan
Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University named after S. Seifullin
Kazakhstan

Yessenzhan Adil – Bachelor's degree in Technology of production and processing of agricultural products,

010000, Astana Zhenis ave., 62



S. Saduakhasova
Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University named after S. Seifullin
Kazakhstan

Saule Saduakhasova – Candidate of Biological Sciences,

010000, Astana Zhenis ave., 62



G. Ospankulova
Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University named after S. Seifullin
Kazakhstan

Gulnazim Ospankulova – Candidate of Biological Sciences,

010000, Astana Zhenis ave., 62



References

1. Abeyrathne E.D.N.S. Egg white proteins and their potential use in food processing or as nutraceutical and pharmaceutical agents – A review // E.D.N.S. Abeyrathne, H.Y. Lee, D.U. Ahn // Poultry science. – 2013. – Т. 92, № 12. – С. 3292-3299.

2. Gutierrez M.A. Nutritive evaluation of hen eggs // M.A. Gutierrez, H. Takahashi, L.R. Juneja // Hen eggs. CRC Press. – 2018. – Р. 25-35.

3. General chemical composition of hen eggs / H. Sugino, T. Nitoda, L.R. Juneja // Hen eggs. CRC press. – 2018. – Р. 13-24.

4. Li-Chan E.C.Y. The chemistry of eggs and egg products / E.C.Y. Li-Chan, W.D. Powrie, S. Nakai // Egg science and technology. CRC Press. –2017. – Р. 105-175.

5. Isolation and purification of immunoglobulins from chicken eggs using thiophilic interaction chromatography / Hansen P. et al. // Journal of immunological methods. – 1998. – Т. 215. – №. 1-2. – С. 1-7.

6. Effect of housing system and eggshell colour on biochemical and microbiological characteristics of pheasant eggs / Nowaczewski S. et al // Archiv fur Geflugelkunde. – 2013. – № 77(4). – Р. 226- 233.

7. Kovacs-Nolan J. Advances in the value of eggs and egg components for human health / J. KovacsNolan, M. Phillips, Y. Mine // Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. – 2005. – Т. 53, № 22. – Р. 8421-8431.

8. Amino acid composition of hen's egg / P. Lunven et al / British Journal of Nutrition. – 1973. – Т. 30, № 2. – Р. 189-194.

9. Song K.T. A comparison of egg quality of pheasant, chukar, quail and guinea fowl / K.T. Song, S.H. Choi, H.R. Oh // Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. – 2000. – Т. 13, № 7. – Р. 986- 990.

10. AOAC, Official methods of analysis, 13th ed. Food com position, Additives, Natural contaminants Eggs and eggs products (chapter 24) / Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc. Arlington, Virginia, USA, 1990. – Р. 1018.

11. ГОСТ 31469-2012. Пищевые продукты переработки яиц сельскохозяйственной птицы. Методы физико-химического анализа. – М.: Стандартинформ, 2014. – 44 с.

12. Rhim J.W. Effects of soy protein coating on shell strength and quality of shell eggs / J.W. Rhim, C.L. Weller, A. Gennadios // Food Science and Biotechnology. – 2004. – Т. 13, № 4. – Р. 455-459.

13. Scott T.A. The effect of storage and strain of hen on egg quality / T.A. Scott, F.G. Silversides // Poultry science. – 2000. – Т. 79, № 12. – Р. 1725-1729.

14. Powrie W.D. Chemistry of eggs and egg products / Egg science and technology. – 1977. – Р. 65-67.

15. Kaewmanee T. Changes in chemical composition, physical properties and microstructure of duck egg as influenced by salting / T. Kaewmanee, S. Benjakul, W. Visessanguan // Food Chemistry. – 2009. – Т. 112, № 3. – Р. 560-569.


Review

For citations:


Kamanova S., Murat L., Yessenzhan A., Saduakhasova S., Ospankulova G. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF FOOD EGGS. Bulletin of Shakarim University. Technical Sciences. 2024;(3(15)):91-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53360/2788-7995-2024-3(15)-13

Views: 143


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2788-7995 (Print)
ISSN 3006-0524 (Online)
X