«Тағам инженериясы және биотехнология», «Химиялық технология», "Техникалық физика және Жылу энергетикасы" және «Автоматтандыру және ақпараттық технологиялар» бағыттары бойынша үшінші нөмірге жарияланымдар қабылдау жабылды!

Прием публикаций на третий номер по направлениям «Пищевая инженерия и биотехнология», «Химическая технология», «Техническая физика и теплоэнергетика» и «Автоматизация и информационные технологии» закрыт!

Submissions for the third issue in the fields of “Food Engineering and Biotechnology”, “Chemical Technology”, "Technical physics and thermal power engineering" and “Automation and Information Technologies” are closed!

Preview

Bulletin of Shakarim University. Technical Sciences

Advanced search

LIVER CANCER PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING (ML) MODELS

https://doi.org/10.53360/2788-7995-2026-2(22)-9

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of machine learning models for predicting liver cancer risk was performed using an open structured clinical dataset. A Kaggle dataset was used in the study (N=5000): target variable Liver_cancer, 13 features (9 numerical, 4 categorical), with class imbalance (0: 78.22%, 1: 21.78%). Data preprocessing, model training and evaluation were carried out within a unified experimental protocol. Numerical variables were normalized via standardization; categorical variables were encoded in binary format.

The comparative analysis included Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine with an RBF kernel, k-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting. All models were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall (sensitivity), specificity, F1-score, and the area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC).

Gradient Boosting achieved the highest overall performance: ROC-AUC=0.999498, Accuracy=0.9754, Precision=0.998967, Sensitivity=0.887971, Specificity=0.999744, F1=0.940204. Although SVM (RBF) and Random Forest demonstrated stable discrimination, they underperformed compared to Gradient Boosting in terms of sensitivity and F1. The results indicate that selecting a model based on structured clinical features requires a comprehensive multi-metric assessment; key limitations include class imbalance and the absence of external validation.

About the Authors

I. B. Karymsakova
Shakarim University
Kazakhstan

Indira Bekenovna Karymsakova – PhD, Department of Automation and Information Technologies, 

071412, Semey, 20 A Glinka Street



D. Zh. Shyrynkhanova
D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan Technical University
Kazakhstan

Dinara Zhaksylykovna Shyrynkhanova – Doctoral (PhD) student, School of Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, 

070004, Ust-Kamenogorsk, 19 Serikbayeva Street



G. Zhomartkyzy
D. Serikbayev East Kazakhstan Technical University
Kazakhstan

Gulnaz Zhomartkyzy – PhD, Associate Professor, School of Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, 

070004, Ust-Kamenogorsk, 19 Serikbayeva Street



D. O. Kozhakhmetova
Shakarim University
Kazakhstan

Dinara Oshanovna Kozhakhmetova – PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Automation and Information Technologies, 

071412, Semey, 20 A Glinka Street



T. A. Ustinova
Shakarim University
Kazakhstan

Tatyana Anatolyevna Ustinova – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Automation and Information Technologies, 

071412, Semey, 20 A Glinka Street



References

1. Global Cancer Observatory (GCO). Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts: Fact sheet. GLOBOCAN 2022. – Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2024. https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/cancers/11-liver-and-intrahepatic-bile-ductsfact-sheet.pdf (accessed date: 21.02.2026)

2. Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review / N. Amin et al // Diseases. – 2025. – Vol. 13, № 7. – Art. 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13070207.

3. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma // Journal of Hepatology. – 2018. – Vol. 69, № 1. – P. 182- 236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019.

4. Current Status and Analysis of Machine Learning in Hepatocellular Carcinoma / S. Feng et al // Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology. – 2023. – Vol. 11, № 5. – P. 1184-1191. https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2022.00077S.

5. Novel machine learning models outperform risk scores in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis / G.L.-H. Wong et al // JHEP Reports. – 2022. – Vol. 4, № 3. – Art. 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100441.

6. An artificial intelligence model to predict hepatocellular carcinoma risk in Korean and Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis B / H.Y. Kim et al // Journal of Hepatology. – 2022. – Vol. 76, № 2. – P. 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.025.

7. Machine-learning Approach for the Development of a Novel Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma / M. Sato et al // Scientific Reports. – 2019. – Vol. 9, № 1. – Art. 7704. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44022-8.

8. Machine Learning Prediction Models for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma with HCVrelated Chronic Liver Disease / S. Hashem et al // Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. – 2020. – Vol. 196. – Art. 105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105551.

9. Feature reduction for hepatocellular carcinoma prediction using machine learning algorithms / G. Mostafa et al // Journal of Big Data. – 2024. – Vol. 11. – Art. 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00944-3.

10. Machine learning model using immune indicators to predict outcomes in early liver cancer / Y. Zhang et al // World Journal of Gastroenterology. – 2025. – Vol. 31, № 5. – Art. 101722. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i5.101722.

11. Deep learning-based classification and mutation prediction from histopathological images of hepatocellular carcinoma / H. Liao et al // Clinical and Translational Medicine. – 2020. – Vol. 10, № 2. – Art. e102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.102.

12. A machine-learning model to predict hepatocellular carcinoma response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization / A. Morshid et al // Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. – 2019. – Vol. 1, № 5. – Art. e180021. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2019180021.

13. Serologic Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Application of Machine Learning and Implications for Diagnostic Models / P.J. Johnson et al // JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. – 2024. – Vol. 8. – Art. e2300199. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00199.

14. miadul. Predict Liver Cancer from & Clinical Features [Electronic resource] – Kaggle Datasets, 2024. – URL: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/miadul/predict-liver-cancer-from-and-clinicalfeatures (accessed date: 20.02.2026).

15. Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology: a systematic review / P. Dhiman et al // Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. – 2022. – Vol. 6, № 1. – Art. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-022-00126-w.

16. Development of an Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis Method Based on a Neural Network / I. Karymsakova et al // Computers. – 2025. – Vol. 14. – Art. 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14090397.


Review

For citations:


Karymsakova I.B., Shyrynkhanova D.Zh., Zhomartkyzy G., Kozhakhmetova D.O., Ustinova T.A. LIVER CANCER PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING (ML) MODELS. Bulletin of Shakarim University. Technical Sciences. 2026;(2(22)):89-96. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.53360/2788-7995-2026-2(22)-9

Views: 4

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2788-7995 (Print)
ISSN 3006-0524 (Online)
X